3 ms·
I don't like the article overall, but don't have a problem with the internal reference. Way too often, titles are written to be provacative and the content of t
by geuis 14y ago
I don't like the article overall, but don't have a problem with the internal reference. Way too often, titles are written to be provacative and the content of the story is much more mundane, or doesn't even support it. I don't mind an instance where an author elaborates on their lead in an attempt to explain it.
- m0nastic 14y agoI believe SoftwareMaven was referring to the literal "lead" spelling that the writer used (as the majority of actual journalists use the "lede" spelling), not to the reference.
- ambler0 14y agoI was unfamiliar with this. I googled it, and found this discussion: http://howardowens.com/2011/09/18/lede-vs-lead/ http://howardowens.com/2011/09/18/lede-vs-lead/