3 ms·
I'm not a programmer by any means. I am involved with writing though, and often I have to draw on other people's work to support an assertion I'm making. I jus
by Silentio 18y ago
I'm not a programmer by any means. I am involved with writing though, and often I have to draw on other people's work to support an assertion I'm making. I just use some quotation marks "" and cite the author and page number at the end of the sentence (author #).
I know it isn't a one to one example, but I wonder why it is acceptable to quote and cite with no need for permission in literature, but when it comes to code people "own" their ideas?
- pmjordan 18y agoWith regard to copyright, it's usually a question of quantity. Up to 10 lines of code is often regarded irrelevant for copyright purposes. Of course, it's not as simple as that: 10 lines in how concise a language, etc. But it's not a big problem most of the time, in the same way literary or other human-language text is copyrighted but it's still acceptable to quote and cite. But ideas themselves don't fall under copyright; unfortunately, some countries allow the patenting of software algorithms, which do cover the idea to some extent.
- kragen 18y agoIt's an interesting question how much code you can copy under the fair use doctrine. I don't think I've ever seen it tested in court.