3 ms·
You don't need to crowdsource everything. I've never used stars as a good metric because it's literally zero effort. It's anybody who happens by just stars it,
by rpdillon 2y ago
You don't need to crowdsource everything. I've never used stars as a good metric because it's literally zero effort. It's anybody who happens by just stars it, So all you can really conclude from star count is that this is interesting to this number of people.
Two metrics that I think correlate extremely highly with quality: The number of commits in the repository and the date of the most recent commit. I've used a metric based on those two inputs for the past 15 years to evaluate repos and I am not disappointed. Depending on the nature of the project, I weigh the two attributes differently. Some projects are arguably, 'done', and so the date of the most recent commit is not very important in that case.
- michaelmior 2y agoI think "interesting to this number of people" is not a meaningless metric, but I would agree on the two other metrics you cite.
- ryandrake 2y agoThere is a big difference between “highest quality” and “most popular.” Online services constantly confuse the two because it’s easier to measure popularity.
- michaelmior 2y agoI don't disagree. But I think there's at least some positive correlation. The highest quality is unlikely to be the least popular and vice versa.