> It's disappointing to me because the FSF could be so much more influential today I mean, open source advocacy already includes both business-friendly conveni

> It's disappointing to me because the FSF could be so much more influential today I mean, open source advocacy already includes both business-friendly convenience-focused pragmatists and social-friendly, principled advocates of digital freedom who were essentially turned off by RMS's personality and/or approach. Taken together, their work seems like it sets a reasonable ceiling on what FSF-- or any freedom-based organization-- could achieve. If I'm wrong I'd like to know what exactly the FSF could have achieved in your opinion that's above that ceiling, as well as the tactics they'd have use to get there.