3 ms·
Several related cases; the opinion in one of them is here: https://www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/25a0002p-06.pdf https://www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinio
by treetalker 2y ago
Several related cases; the opinion in one of them is here: https://www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/25a0002p-06.pdf https://www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/25a0002p-06.pd...
Lousy reporting: although it quotes the opinion and links to other articles on the same website, the article doesn't bother to cite the opinion or even mention the name of the case, let alone link to the source.
- fooey 2y agothe NYT article links to the same PDF you provided https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/02/technology/net-neutrality-rules-fcc.html https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/02/technology/net-neutrality...
- s1artibartfast 2y agoHuge pet peve of mine. Reporters incentive are to keep you on site, not inform. It is particularly egregious when reporting on governmental public safety announcement and laws. Reporting buries the web results, but fails to cite it. I'm generally a libertarian, but would be in favor of required linking of government PSAs and laws
- emmelaich 2y agoreason.com has good articles on the topic. https://reason.com/tag/net-neutrality/ https://reason.com/tag/net-neutrality/
- kemitchell 2y agoI would love to see HN adopt a policy of replacing links to news pieces about court opinions that don't link them with links to better news pieces that do.
- Dalewyn 2y agoWhy even bother with "news" pieces? They're all just sensationalist trash. Just link to the source directly, most of us here know how to read and (probably) have the mental acuity to form our own conclusions.
- wtallis 2y agoHelpful analysis that provides additional context can exist, eg. SCOTUSBlog that provides useful summaries while reliably linking to the rulings themselves. It's not all sensationalist trash.
- NotYourLawyer 2y agoPretty typical of media reporting on court cases. Just awful.