3 ms·
To be fair, UX isn't only about the point of consumption. 4k torrents don't grow on trees (luckily, 1080p is good enough for my own tastes), and for old or less
by LegionMammal978 2y ago
To be fair, UX isn't only about the point of consumption. 4k torrents don't grow on trees (luckily, 1080p is good enough for my own tastes), and for old or less-popular movies, it's often tough to find seeders, or they all upload at 100 kbps or only have half the file or something dumb like that. (At least on the public trackers I'm aware of: I have no clue what goes on in the super-duper-exclusive private trackers that some love to boast about.)
So I'd put accessibility and consistency as important parts of UX that torrenting can often miss out on. For the common person who is using Windows/Chrome, macOS/Safari, or a gaming console, those parts can easily be more important.
Of course, these methods start to shine when legitimate methods are even less accessible. For instance, U.S. sports streaming is an absolute mess with multiple networks, regional blackouts, etc., on top of buggy apps, so that you sometimes can't watch a game legally for any price. People have widely picked up illegal streams as an alternative, usually preferring familiar platforms like YouTube if the streams aren't taken down quickly enough.
- charrondev 2y agoOn private trackers you can sometimes even see 4k blurry remuxes up before the blueray is even available in your local area due to different release windows around the world. As far as I’ve seen, they pretty much grow on trees as far as films are concerned. TV shows are a very different story though and outside of hugely popular series are far more inconsistent.