4 ms·
Well, users paying for Netflix, are not supposed to be subject to unasked quality downsampling just because you watch from a non-TV device. This sort of optimiz
by mentalgear 2y ago
Well, users paying for Netflix, are not supposed to be subject to unasked quality downsampling just because you watch from a non-TV device. This sort of optimization might be fine with small laptop screens, but not 5k Computer screens, and I don't know if Netflix does it on purpose or just put `if not TV => send lowerRes` in their code (simplified of course).
- arianvanp 2y agoThe answer is piracy. There are no content providers that are confident enough in their DRM to send 4k streams to devices that are in control of their owners instead of cooperations. PCs are the scariest thing ever and they will do everything in their power to kill them. Pirate content and be free Or buy an apple tv and hook it up to your monitor.
- buran77 2y agoPirate sites obtain the high quality material as soon as it's launched anyway, so this kind of "protection" just adds friction for the paying user.
- ruszki 2y agoThese restrictions are never there to prevent piracy. It’s there for corporates to be able to say that “we did everything”. They are there for legal reasons. That’s true for every single security features. It’s a side effect if some security feature is really effective. Most of them are just annoyance, they don’t prevent anything.
- ThatMedicIsASpy 2y agoThere are enough games out there to simply show this isn't true.
- ruszki 2y agoWhat do you mean?
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- trollied 2y agoWhich is just crazy, considering lots of the $15 HDMI switchers on Amazon actually strip HDCP, and you can then use a capture card to record whatever you want from a 4k supporting device. I guess they're just preventing the easiest methods.
- Aachen 2y agoThe best kind of restriction: annoys everyone (because they need to claim they tried to prevent piracy) except those who are serious about circumventing the restriction