3 ms·
You can have stars without trees, but you can’t have trees without stars.
by FabHK 2y ago
You can have stars without trees, but you can’t have trees without stars.
- imoverclocked 2y agoIf we substitute something else in this argument, we can see that it’s trivially not true for arguing complexity: You can have stars without lead, but you can’t have lead without stars; Lead (the element) is produced by stars but is itself not more complex than a star.