4 ms·
Confirming my rule: if you can’t reach it with United, Lufthansa or ANA - it’s not worth flying to. Granted all of these have things wrong (LH C is ancient and
by lobochrome 2y ago
Confirming my rule: if you can’t reach it with United, Lufthansa or ANA - it’s not worth flying to.
Granted all of these have things wrong (LH C is ancient and has no privacy, UA staff is hit and miss, ANA is mostly excellent).
I don’t like changing planes in the desert thus the Arabian ones are off the plate…
- lostlogin 2y agoI don't know about the other two, but Lufthansa? thats a low bar. I'd prefer Singapore, Air New Zealand or Qantas. Qatar would feature, but the molesty episode makes them too intense. https://apnews.com/article/qatar-australia-united-arab-emirates-dubai-sydney-11def21cbad879ff8bd2e55772f7ff88 https://apnews.com/article/qatar-australia-united-arab-emira...
- lobochrome 2y agoIf I need to go to Singapore sure. If I need to go to down under or New Zealand sure.
- BlackJack 2y agoANA is good but isn't even the best airline in its' own country. LH isn't the best airline in its' own group (Swiss and Austrian have better seats/service, and Swiss has equivalently good coverage). United is probably the best US airline for international but domestically Delta is arguably better.
- lobochrome 2y agoI detest Swiss for forcing me to watch ads - also their service is hit or miss (okay same for lh) Austrian just doesn’t have any routes I need. JAL is on the wrong alliance thus I have only domestic experience.
- myrandomcomment 2y agoAgreed. JAL for the win.
- yongjik 2y agoUnited? I don't have much preferences with airlines, but I had a really bad experience with United, so I try to avoid them as much as possible.