> tent cities are not a harm to those who are subject to them Nothing inherent about tent cities harms neighbors. They could be badly located but so can lots o

> tent cities are not a harm to those who are subject to them Nothing inherent about tent cities harms neighbors. They could be badly located but so can lots of things. They suck as housing, but the residents wouldn't be there if they had better options. > It’s a bit meme-ish Whatever this means, who cares? We're talking about shelter and human rights, not memes. > sidewalk poop is actually a quality of life issue Yes, that could be an actual health risk, but I think people are searching for a justification. I'm dubious it's really a big problem, or one that requires taking away anyone's freedom. How about providing a bathroom? If it's ok to take away people's freedom, why don't you give up yours? We could force you to walk down a different sidewalk.