3 ms·
I know this is easy for people to say in theory, but as mentioned elsewhere, if this materialized into an attack people would’ve retrospectively seen that as “c
by llamaimperative 2y ago
I know this is easy for people to say in theory, but as mentioned elsewhere, if this materialized into an attack people would’ve retrospectively seen that as “certain” evidence of intent.
- NicholasGurr 2y ago[flagged]
- llamaimperative 2y ago[flagged]
- NicholasGurr 2y ago[flagged]
- jrflowers 2y agoYou make a good point. When you see a stranger write the word “people” on the internet, they are talking about you, NicholasGurr, The One Person That Exists
- NicholasGurr 2y ago[flagged]
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- sangnoir 2y ago[flagged]
- NicholasGurr 2y ago[flagged]
- 542354234235 2y agoMost evidence is circumstantial. If someone walks into your office with a wet umbrella, that is evidence that it is raining outside but it doesn’t prove that it is raining. Some evidence is stronger than others, but it is all evidence and should be judged in its totality. Having a flag of a terrorist organization doesn’t prove anything, but it is still evidence. Having a knife, rope, and duct tape in your car doesn’t prove anything, but it is still evidence. It is throwing logic out the window to ignore context and the totality of evidence.