3 ms·
Wouldn't this just encourage another killdoser situation without the guns? Just the armor? I mean if someone wants to cause mass causulty and terror its going
by tonetegeatinst 2y ago
Wouldn't this just encourage another killdoser situation without the guns? Just the armor?
I mean if someone wants to cause mass causulty and terror its going to happen, be it a gun or a knife or explosive. Hell I'd argue cyber attacks could also do the same.
- mschuster91 2y ago> I mean if someone wants to cause mass causulty and terror its going to happen, be it a gun or a knife or explosive. Sure, the general idea though is to raise the barrier - both to make it more difficult to get the weapon in question and to have better chances of red flags popping up somewhere along the chain. Same for gun background checks outside of the US, for requiring CDLs to rent trucks capable of plowing through assemblies of people, or for requiring at least a CPL if not an ATPL to pilot a plane capable of dealing a large amount of damage. The higher the damage potential in the hands of someone abusing a thing for terrorism, the higher the barriers to entry should be.