3 ms·

If you want to go down a rabbit hole, lookup videos on youtube of clearly paranoid schizophrenics that believe the fed has them under watch. I randomly fond one

If you want to go down a rabbit hole, lookup videos on youtube of clearly paranoid schizophrenics that believe the fed has them under watch. I randomly fond one once and it was wild the mental gymnastics being done to justify her belief. I really felt bad for the woman.

aspenmayer 2y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gang_stalking https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gang_stalking
neilv 2y ago
In this case, I figured the person who said "Is already open season on the non-millionaire populace, it has been for a long time." was referring to various inequities (for example, the effects of regulatory capture). (Not some literal murderous hunting of the lower classes for sport by the elite, nor some black helicopter conspiracy theory.) But they were responding to a message about political murders that included "[...] you don't want to signal to the militant mentally ill that it's open season." So they left a gap between the prompt and the response, for the reader to figure out what was implied. One guess of the reader about the gap could be that the speaker is simply taking the opportunity to point out, or complain about, the inequities. Or, a different guess of the reader about the gap could be that the writer is hinting that they think the inquity situation has escalated, or should escalate, to political murders. Maybe they mean that, or, I'd guess more likely, they just feel disempowered by the inequities, and suggesting that the citizenry has power provides some hope or relief. Since the writer didn't say, the gap is closed by the reader's own biases or suspicions of what the writer intended. Assuming that the writer is a normal individual (not psyops), then saying what they mean by the gap would help them communicate. I suppose that saying what they mean might also help their message not be lost in the massive flood of social media point-scoring noise.

aspenmayer 2y ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gang_stalking https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gang_stalking

neilv 2y ago

In this case, I figured the person who said "Is already open season on the non-millionaire populace, it has been for a long time." was referring to various inequities (for example, the effects of regulatory capture). (Not some literal murderous hunting of the lower classes for sport by the elite, nor some black helicopter conspiracy theory.) But they were responding to a message about political murders that included "[...] you don't want to signal to the militant mentally ill that it's open season." So they left a gap between the prompt and the response, for the reader to figure out what was implied. One guess of the reader about the gap could be that the speaker is simply taking the opportunity to point out, or complain about, the inequities. Or, a different guess of the reader about the gap could be that the writer is hinting that they think the inquity situation has escalated, or should escalate, to political murders. Maybe they mean that, or, I'd guess more likely, they just feel disempowered by the inequities, and suggesting that the citizenry has power provides some hope or relief. Since the writer didn't say, the gap is closed by the reader's own biases or suspicions of what the writer intended. Assuming that the writer is a normal individual (not psyops), then saying what they mean by the gap would help them communicate. I suppose that saying what they mean might also help their message not be lost in the massive flood of social media point-scoring noise.