4 ms·
In what way(s) do you consider the Dreamcast hardware vastly superior? It had a slower CPU, slower GPU, and less memory if I remember correctly.
by crest 2y ago
In what way(s) do you consider the Dreamcast hardware vastly superior? It had a slower CPU, slower GPU, and less memory if I remember correctly.
- epcoa 2y agoThe DC had double the VRAM (and 4MB on the PS2 was paltry) and hardware texture compression, texture quality was better, and the analog video output path was better and most games run 480p vs 480i. 480p on the Dreamcast looks better (an advantage that most North American consumers using the included composite cable would not have been able to appreciate). All said, indeed it was not vastly superior.