2 ms·
This result is the same as a recent test of the same method+hypothesis from a group at Apple, no? I don’t have that reference handy but I don’t think I’m maki
by huitzitziltzin 2y ago
This result is the same as a recent test of the same method+hypothesis from a group at Apple, no? I don’t have that reference handy but I don’t think I’m making it up.
- intelkishan 2y agoI think you are probably referring to the following paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.05229 https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.05229
- huitzitziltzin 2y agoYup, looks like the one I meant! I am impressed by the progress on LLMs but I remain skeptical that they can replace humans. Perhaps some (distant!) future model but I don’t fear mass unemployment (for example) or even moderate LLM-driven unemployment in the near-to-medium term. They can clearly complement human labor but there are vanishingly few domains where they can be substitutes.