My comment did not refer to the article at all. It was if they had read the link to the law they pasted. Which near as I can tell they hadn’t, because the conte

My comment did not refer to the article at all. It was if they had read the link to the law they pasted. Which near as I can tell they hadn’t, because the content of the law is the opposite of what they are asserting it is. Feel free to check the law yourself if you’d like.