2 ms·
The meat of the argument of the post was a restatement of the past three posts that I've made. I did lead with the argument, in somewhat less detail.
by vkou 2y ago
The meat of the argument of the post was a restatement of the past three posts that I've made. I did lead with the argument, in somewhat less detail.
- lolinder 2y agoNo, you didn't, you led with this: > In 2024, this isn't fact, it's just baseless conspiracy. > All evidence has ended up pointing to bush meat contamination. This isn't science communication, it's a condescending rebuke. That said, I'm done here. Thanks for clarifying in the end, and happy new year!