One justification after another to abuse people, is what I read. > pretty reliable correlation I have yet to see that correlation. To my eye, there is a corre

One justification after another to abuse people, is what I read. > pretty reliable correlation I have yet to see that correlation. To my eye, there is a correlation between some things and a lack of housing. For example, access to bathrooms. But the obsession with poop is becoming childish; poop - gross! In all my time in cities, I don't know that I've ever seen it. I don't know that it's a common problem, but just a dramatic example that advocates like to pull out. > That's less about intentional cruelty and more about saving the ship. First, people here are openly embracing cruelty. Second, 'unintentional cruely' would be a highly immature, irresponsible concept. I think 'saving the ship' is greatly exaggerating the risks in order to justify the abuse. It's a very serious thing to take away someone's inherent, inalienable freedom.