4 ms·
Just buy a separate low-cost device and use that only for your banking. It's a total non-issue, there are way more nefarious uses of SafetyNet/the attestation
by zozbot234 2y ago
Just buy a separate low-cost device and use that only for your banking. It's a total non-issue, there are way more nefarious uses of SafetyNet/the attestation API's.
- homebrewer 2y agoYou'll have to change it often if you're worried about safety at all. Lineage has been keeping my phone alive for five years now, and although it only updates the upper layers and there are definitely unfixed vulns in the firmware, it's much better than if I'd used the stock OS that hasn't been updated since the beginning of 2020. Banks don't or won't understand this.
- xuki 2y ago> Banks don't or won't understand this. They are not interested in that. They want attestation because they can "outsource" the responsibility to Google.
- wkat4242 2y agoThe problem is you need banking stuff on the go more and more. Here in Spain for example people often pay friends with a service called bizum that works through the bank's app. It's definitely not a non issue for me.
- pimterry 2y agoIt's not just banking. Though that's clearly the most inconvenient, I've heard stories of this in all sorts of contexts, and Google actively push it for _all_ apps in the play console etc now. Carrying two devices just to use basic things will work, but god that sounds annoying. I'm curious though, what are the more nefarious uses you're concerned about?
- n144q 2y ago> It's a total non-issue Buying a separate device and carrying it all the time just for banking is a big ask for most people, even for geeks who hack their Android phones.