4 ms·
No, that means it's clear that LLM-assisted coding can do better than described here. Which implies humans are adding a lot.
by rhubarbtree 2y ago
No, that means it's clear that LLM-assisted coding can do better than described here. Which implies humans are adding a lot.
- NitpickLawyer 2y agoTo be fair, there's probably not a lot that "humans" add when the solution is solved in 4 and 5 seconds respectively. That's clearly 100% automated. Most humans can't even read the problem in that timeframes. A better implication would be that proper use of LLMs implies more than OP did here (proper prompting, looping the answer w/ a code check, etc.)
- zaptheimpaler 2y agoI think you're trying to dunk on me without actually knowing much about the matter. You can look at the leaderboard times and the github repos too. They are fully automated to fetch input, prompt LLMs and submit the answer within 10 seconds.
- rhubarbtree 2y agoSome of them, yes.