3 ms·
There was no reason to call it something it's not ("chain of cont. thought" ≠ coconut).
by behnamoh 2y ago
There was no reason to call it something it's not ("chain of cont. thought" ≠ coconut).
- CGamesPlay 2y agoIs your complaint here that the paper is not discussing a literal coconut?
- ripped_britches 2y agoWe desperately need more literal coconut coverage here on HN
- BoorishBears 2y agoNot just any regular old coconuts "Coconut by Meta AI - Better LLM Reasoning with Chain of Continuous Thought?" coconuts (Sometimes acronyms in titles are vague/misleading... this was not one of those times)
- layer8 2y agoTo be fair, it’s not even a metaphorical coconut. ;)
- gloosx 2y agofor sure, chocothot aligns better with letters