3 ms·
Very well said. This is the approach we're taking with peergos, paid accounts unless you self host. I wrote some of our thoughts on this here: https://peergos.
by ianopolous 2y ago
Very well said. This is the approach we're taking with peergos, paid accounts unless you self host. I wrote some of our thoughts on this here:
https://peergos.org/posts/the-social-dilemma https://peergos.org/posts/the-social-dilemma
- strogonoff 2y ago1. I am not sure it is possible to compete with a free product. By definition it will have more users. That’s the tragedy, competition is not possible. 2. My approach is not “one more product will be the answer”, more like “fixing the incentives and making the market work will enable many products”.
- ianopolous 2y ago1. It depends on the time scale. The question is if you can outlive their VC funding. 2. How do you fix the incentives short of fixing capitalism to remove software VCs?
- strogonoff 2y ago1. They are supported by paying customers (the advertisers), not just VC money. 2. You don’t need to get rid of VCs, it’s orthogonal. Just make interoperation/complete API coverage required by law to be available to any user if you have more users than certain amount. It would neuter the lock-in when anyone can make a third-party GUI that has no ads and interoperates with any other social platform (meaning no “all my friends are there” effect).
- ianopolous 2y agoYes, legally requiring open APIs and interop beyond X users is the best way forward. There is some tension with allowing product changes and deprecating old APIs though. Maybe something like mandate versioned APIs, and keep old versions around for at least 2 years after newer version is released.