3 ms·

So random blog posts are then? Edit: anyway, I've seen this discussion a million times. Not interested in engaging further.

• mhb 2y ago
  No one was claiming that a random blog post is impartial or authoritative despite it's being right.
  • karmakurtisaani 2y ago
    Ok, one more comment, since this is an interesting read: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_support_for_Hamas https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_support_for_Hamas Netanyahu supporting Hamas and helping enable the attacks must be a tough pill to swallow, huh?
    • dlubarov 2y ago
      Wikipedia's neutrality has become a joke when it comes to Israel-related topics. For an obvious example, the first paragraph of the Zionism article says "Zionists wanted to create a Jewish state in Palestine with as much land, as many Jews, and as few Palestinian Arabs as possible". Here, you seem to be interpreting this somewhat misleading article as Israel (somehow, maybe indirectly) supporting Hamas' military. Really it was Qatari funding for various Gaza infrastructure and humanitarian projects. Do you think Israel should have blocked that aid?
    • mhb 2y ago
      Wikipedia and the Times on Israel? It is to laugh.