"If I own a piece of land then by virtue of that ownership I get an almost unlimited veto on what is allowed to be done to that piece of land." That belief is

"If I own a piece of land then by virtue of that ownership I get an almost unlimited veto on what is allowed to be done to that piece of land." That belief is very culturally dependent. For example, in "freedom to roam" countries (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_to_roam https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_to_roam), you as a landowner do not have the blanket right to prevent people from walking through your land, from picking berries on your land, nor from camping on your land. In California, the beach below the high-water mark is a public right of way and you as landowner may not prevent people from using is, nor block off paths people use to exercise that right. In the United States, eminent domain means that no landowner has an unlimited veto. Since your antecedent is not correct, your logical argument cannot be used to assess the validity of your conclusion.