> How exactly would doctors fund their own residency programs? I said hospitals. You'd do your residency and then have a commitment to keep working at the hosp

> How exactly would doctors fund their own residency programs? I said hospitals. You'd do your residency and then have a commitment to keep working at the hospital for say 3 years (or otherwise repaying the training). > In game theory terms this is essentially a free rider problem Yes, this is exactly what I mean by founded on negative sum interactions. Every player is focused on avoiding costs rather than providing value. In a sane market, when a business can't find employees they offer higher wages, overtime, train new employees, etc. That's positive sum that grows the industry, rather than just throwing their hands up and letting the shortages build. > There have been some attempts to introduce market dynamics such as high-deductible health plans (HDHP) with HSAs I guess if you squint really hard, just subjecting patients to even more unknown charges is some kind of attempt? I'm talking about things like making providers beholden to the basic legal norms of commerce that apply everywhere else. End this nonsense where providers won't answer questions about how much anything costs, but then shake you down after the fact with a volley of fraudulent bills - that foundation is already askew from how every other industry works. Imagine going to the grocery store, and then receiving bills over the next year from the cashier, shelf stocker, distributor, etc, all claiming that you're also responsible for paying them. Healthy industries work by consolidating costs and making prices legible. The healthcare industry is stuck in a state of doing the exact opposite, but yet has managed to entrench itself with the entitlement of still getting paid. If providers want to be able to bill patients directly then they need to do the work of forming actual contracts based on fixed price services, estimated work, hourly rates, etc (once again like every other industry). Or if you've got a healthcare plan and go to providers they point you to, the only entity you should ever be receiving bills from is the plan itself. > Thus the only way to constrain total system costs is by artificially limiting supply and imposing some sort of rationing. So the real argument ends up being about how we do the rationing. So just scrap the entire concept of individual agency? Are you a doctor or something? And lest people jump on me for not just toeing the party line of "single payer" - as I said this is orthogonal to who may be ultimately paying. Furthermore, if we're going to be paying for a base level of care with public funds (which we're already doing for a large part), then we want to be spending that money wisely and not squandering it on a system sick with organizational cancer.