3 ms·
> What is the point of this experiment? To see if your methods will actually result in anything good. > Is it OK to propose for Ukrainians to sabotage the liv
by cyberax 2y ago
> What is the point of this experiment?
To see if your methods will actually result in anything good.
> Is it OK to propose for Ukrainians to sabotage the lives of Russian generals?
Of course. Top military personnel are a valid target in a war.
> I'm trying to apply good faith, in which case I'm going to assume you're not arguing that there has never existed a set of circumstances under which such actions would be "OK".
Pretty much. If you have to resort to terrorism, then your goal is probably indefensible.
Violence is defensible only as a response to violence.
- maeil 2y agoIf I turn up with a bulldozer and destroy your house, is that violence? How about if I flood your entire state/region permanently, both destroying your living, as well as that of your friends and families, as well as forcing you to relocate to a region you have nothing in common with? Someone throwing a punch in your face is violence. Is that more acceptable to counter with violence than the previous scenario? I haven't met a single person who genuinely believes that. "violence" can express itself in many ways. > Pretty much. If you have to resort to terrorism, then your goal is probably indefensible. Terrorism is a meaningless tern used to appeal to emotion. One's terrorist is another's freedom fighter. Nearly every colonizer was overthrown by such a group. In many places, slavery was overturned by such groups.