46 ms·
I'm not being cynical, but are they purposefully holding back some of the more important details on the "How it works" on http://www.tweaky.com/ http://www.twe
by richardv 14y ago
I'm not being cynical, but are they purposefully holding back some of the more important details on the "How it works" on http://www.tweaky.com/ http://www.tweaky.com/
I can't actually find the details on this. Is this an offline service, or are you expected to provide access to your development server?
This is what I think it would say (which would scare the hell out of me)...
1. Submit your brief
2. We assign each task a $25 charge.
3. You pick a developer.
4. You provide FTP details to your live production server
- dsirijus 14y agoI think it is mostly revolving around fixing CSS or markup so you don't have to provide anything really, besides the link to live version. That is limiting though, I imagine I would think twice before sending either credentials for production server or entire source or something.
- MichaelApproved 14y agoThere are many people who won't care about providing a designer with production server credentials. I'm guessing it's probably the same people who are looking for $25 tweaks. In fact, those same people would probably see it as a perk to the service that the designer implements the code for you. The "safety" probably comes from them being hand-picked. For those that care, they could make the CSS changes and image uploads themselves.
- whatusername 14y agoCurrently online. Having talked to the tweaky guys last week -- they are aware of the potential concern -- have some mitigations (encryption/etc) in place -- don't feel that it's a massive concern of the target market -- and have prototypes of more detailed technical solutions. In short -- smart guys - and they have a strategy to deal with it if the market says that random developer access to prod is bad. (And I think the market for $25 tweaks is probably ok with that anyway)