3 ms·
> There is no atemporal “frozen” state we can call consciousness. It is dynamic. That is a huge assumption we just have no way of knowing. For starters, we don
by vidarh 2y ago
> There is no atemporal “frozen” state we can call consciousness. It is dynamic.
That is a huge assumption we just have no way of knowing. For starters, we don't know whether we are in an atemporal "frozen" state or not.
- robwwilliams 2y agoIt is a highly pragmatic assumption like absolutely everything else, even cogito ergo sum. Tell me what is not an assumption and then maybe we can talk. My take: Epistemology is metaphysical bs, and “truth” is a convention we agree to within communities of speakers.
- vidarh 2y agoAs an axiom for discussing our observable world, sure, it's pragmatic. But it remains an assumption. I wouldn't dream of suggesting cogito ergo sum isn't an assumption. On the contrary, it's a very shaky assumption. The passage of time is a more reasonable one, but it's still one we have no evidence for. It's reasonable to assume, and so allow us to talk about the passage of time even though we have no conclusive evidence for it, but that does not make it reasonable to claim conscioussness requires a dynamic system, because we don't know and can't know, only act as if it does.