3 ms·
> if one wanted, it'd be easy to Which, again, is a statement that gets to the root of the idea of "technical debt". You can excuse almost anything like that.
by ajross 2y ago
> if one wanted, it'd be easy to
Which, again, is a statement that gets to the root of the idea of "technical debt". You can excuse almost anything like that. It still doesn't make it better than a design that works by default. I remain shocked that this seems to be controversial.
FWIW: io_uring has been very loudly criticized for being hard to implement, maintain and use, via some of this same logic, yes. This isn't a senseless platform flame. Linux does bad stuff too. There are good designs and bad designs everywhere, and io_uring is probably not one (though to be fair it does have some extremely attractive performance characteristics, so I guess one might be tempted to forgive a few warts in the interface layers).
- markjdb 2y agoA design that works by default isn't automatically better either though. You have to look at the details. > I guess one might be tempted to forgive a few warts in the interface layers ... well, yeah, that's exactly my sentiment about kqueue here. What you're talking about is basically a small wart that no one's bothered to address because it's inconsequential.