> communities have to do a lot more work to understand the idiosyncratic policies of each server [links to a github issue that is 90% internal project bureocra

> communities have to do a lot more work to understand the idiosyncratic policies of each server [links to a github issue that is 90% internal project bureocracy, 10% "didn't read the terms"]. I think this is actually another instance of the "people don't actually want to pay for choice": the moderation policies for the big social sites are just incomprehensible, but you don't have any agency over them if you use the sites, which is simple. On Mastodon you do get to choose what moderation you subject yourself to (to some extent), but obviously making that choice requires work since there are real differences.