3 ms·
> and libre version is GPL3 cancer which is not suitable for commercial development. YTF would GPL v. 3 be "cancer" for commercial development? (Shades of Ball
by CRConrad 2y ago
> and libre version is GPL3 cancer which is not suitable for commercial development.
YTF would GPL v. 3 be "cancer" for commercial development? (Shades of Ballmer; is Linux also "a cancer" to you?)
EULAs have all kinds of stupid shit in them already. Just make yours GPL3-compatible.