3 ms·
Dammit, the video doesn’t explain why we have 4 twisted pairs in our cables instead of just 2! One for Rx, one for Tx, but then why did they keep the other two
by loup-vaillant 2y ago
Dammit, the video doesn’t explain why we have 4 twisted pairs in our cables instead of just 2! One for Rx, one for Tx, but then why did they keep the other two? Surely they didn’t have 4 dead wires just because of legacy? So why the additional pairs, what were they used for?
- tuetuopay 2y agoSignal integrity basically. Using more pairs means reducing the bandwidth needed on each pair, thus the cost of the cable.
- userbinator 2y agoIt's also a tradeoff with the cost of the NIC hardware --- look at how much bandwidth xDSL technologies have been able to squeeze into a single traditional twisted-pair phone line, but they use far more complex signal processing techniques than Ethernet.
- dfox 2y agoOriginally it was more or less one for POTS, one Rx, one Tx and one spare (used for power in ISDN S/T interface, which otherwise shares the same pinout). Then came 1000-base-T, where the “base” is kind of misnomer and it is actually related to SHDSL. Each pair is essentially a separate full-duplex 250Mbps link with active echo cancellation and four of them is combined to create one 1Gbps link.