28 ms·
> assuming infinite resolution this is an assumption that goes against the concept of "f-number" so if one does it, they should not expect to get to anything s
by GiovanniP 2y ago
> assuming infinite resolution
this is an assumption that goes against the concept of "f-number" so if one does it, they should not expect to get to anything sensible.
- wvbdmp 2y agoI just meant sensor pixels, because you’re obviously losing those when cropping, but you get the same perspective as from larger focal length (since you’re not moving).
- GiovanniP 2y agoI agree that the images correspond to the same region in object space. Further assumptions on optical resolution don't work well, as the optical resolution depends on the f-number.
- Anotheroneagain 2y agoThe angular resolution depends purely on the aperture diameter, not the f-number. There should be no difference between capturing the image in high resolution, and blowing it up for a lower resolution sensor. All that should be needed is a 200mpx sensor that can output the entire frame in 12mpx, and 12mpx of the central area in full resolution. It's similar to how our eyes work.