3 ms·
Nothing concrete in any of those links, but they all smack of bad faith (and the middle one didn’t even depict a ban). That said, if people whose entire person
by minitech 2y ago
Nothing concrete in any of those links, but they all smack of bad faith (and the middle one didn’t even depict a ban).
That said, if people whose entire personality is being anti-trans perceive Bluesky as ban-happy and aren’t interested in it, I see that as a win.
- josteink 2y ago> they all smack of bad faith > That said, if people whose entire personality is being anti-trans Are you talking about protecting women’s rights? That’s pro something, not anti something, right? So speaking of bad faith… The only one I see acting in bad faith here is you?
- dettil 2y agoIt's both. To be pro-women is to be anti-trans, and vice versa. The two stances are fundamentally incompatible.
- minitech 2y agoNo, I’m not talking about protecting women’s rights. I hope if you were to imagine (in good faith!) a person “whose entire personality is protecting women’s rights” and a person “whose entire personality is being anti-trans” you’d come up with different images. Btw, you’re firmly doing the bad faith thing now, and were from the very start when you danced around the truth with language like “commonly held views and scientific facts”.