2 ms·
Because they A) are not that capable and did not know about it B) knew about it, but sat on it for their own egoistical reasons Both are rather a ba
by atoav 2y ago
Because they
A) are not that capable and did not know about it
B) knew about it, but sat on it for their own egoistical reasons
Both are rather a bad look
- lokimedes 2y agoOr C) Blue team analysis is not offered the same resources and interest as Red team analysis. There’s also the “don’t ascribe to maliciousness what can be caused by bureaucracy“
- atoav 2y agoWhat you describe in C falls under A) are not that capable and did not know about it - investing all into offence means you're not capable in defense. Making sure the encryption of the major military alliance you're part of doesn't fall apart seems like a serious miss, no matter how we slice it. Be the reason bureaucratic, malicous or financial.
- crest 2y agoThere're more options, but those require multiple nation states to work together in a conspiracy (everyone in the know) and all others to be incompetent. Given just publicly known facts and Occam's razor…