I don't see how this "unhoused" term is an effective euphemism relative to "homeless". "un-" is not any softer than "-less". For instance, it's not any better

I don't see how this "unhoused" term is an effective euphemism relative to "homeless". "un-" is not any softer than "-less". For instance, it's not any better to be called "ungrateful" than "thankless". The "home" to "house" change also shows no detectable movement along the euphemistic gradient. This is just a bunch of woke people deciding to use a different word which has about the same sugar content, purely so that they could then feel superior to those who are not yet using the new word.