4 ms·
In my experience, it always pays to substitute the subject to the broader version when determining if something is discriminatory. How does this project sound?
by kondro 14y ago
In my experience, it always pays to substitute the subject to the broader version when determining if something is discriminatory.
How does this project sound?
"A project [to empower men], launched by men, aimed at men, because men are an observable majority in our industry."
- jacques_chester 14y ago> In my experience, it always pays to substitute the subject to the broader version when determining if something is discriminatory. How does that follow? I'd genuinely like to know your reasoning.
- kondro 14y agoI come from a minority myself (gay from the ironically named Queensland) and find people say the stupidest things that, if modified as suggested, they would be embarrassed to say about themselves.
- jacques_chester 14y agoGay in Queensland is a tough ask, depending on how far north you are. But I'm still not following. How does substituting in "majority" for "minority" undermine the case for the minority?