6 ms·

Show HN: Chorus, a Mac app that lets you chat with a bunch of AIs at once

139 points by Charlieholtz 2y ago

There's so many cool models to try but they're all in different places. In Chorus you can chat with a bunch of models all at once, and add your own system prompts. Like 4o with a CBT overview, or a succinct Claude. Excited to hear your thoughts!

nomilk 2y ago
Love the idea. I frequently use ChatGPT (out of habit) and while it's generating, copy/paste the same prompt into claude and grok. This seems like a good way to save time.
sleno 2y ago
very well designed! how does this work? in the sense that i didn't have to copy/paste any keys and yet this is offering paid models for free.
- swyx 2y ago
  if you are not paying... you are the product
  - KingMob 2y ago
    As Cory Doctorow has documented, you're frequently still the product even when paying: https://pluralistic.net/2024/03/12/market-failure/#car-wars https://pluralistic.net/2024/03/12/market-failure/#car-wars
  - Charlieholtz 2y ago
    ahah true, but in this case, we're (melty) just paying right now. I wanted to make it really easy to try and didn't implement bring your own keys yet. I probably should ask O1 to fix that
- Charlieholtz 2y ago
  Thanks! Right now Chorus is proxying API calls to our server so it's free. This was kind of an experimental winter break project that we were using internally, and it was quicker to ship this way. Likely going to add bring your own API keys (or a paid version) soon. Update: just added option to bring your own keys! Should be available within an hour.
maroonblazer 2y ago
Just tried this with an interpersonal situation I'm going through. The default seems to be Claude 3.5 Sonnet and ChatGPT-4o. I got the results I've come to expect from those two, with the latter better at non-programming kinds of prompts. The app presented the option of prompting additional models, including Gemini Flash 2.0, one I'd never used before. It gave the best response and was surprisingly good. Curious to know how Chorus is paying for the compute, as I was expecting to have to use my own API keys.
- owenpalmer 2y ago
  Do they have really strict rate limits? How much did you use it?
- benatkin 2y ago
  Some throttling plus having a limited number of users by it being a desktop app perhaps. I just checked to see if it was signed, without running it. It is. I don't care to take the risk of running it even if it's signed. If it were a web app I'd check it out. I don't know if there's any sort of login. With a login, they could throttle based on that. Without a login, it looks like they could use this to check if it's being used by an Apple computer. https://developer.apple.com/documentation/devicecheck/validating-apps-that-connect-to-your-server https://developer.apple.com/documentation/devicecheck/valida...
  - sunnybeetroot 2y ago
    DeviceCheck is not available for macOS apps, see the following documentation: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/devicecheck/dcappattestservice/issupported https://developer.apple.com/documentation/devicecheck/dcappa...
    - benatkin 2y ago
      I see. I had checked attestKey and it says "Mac Catalyst 14.0+ | macOS 11.0+" among others, but that just means the API is present. developer.apple.com/documentation/devicecheck/dcappattestservice/attestkey(_:clientdatahash:completionhandler:)
486sx33 2y ago
Sweet !
paul7986 2y ago
Cool and GPT/Claude think there are only 2 "r"s in strawberry? Wow that's a bit scary (use GPT a lot) how bad a fail that is!
- joshstrange 2y ago
  I maintain that “2 ‘r’s” is a semi-valid answer. If a human is writing, pauses and looks up to ask that question they almost certainly want to hear “2”.
  - furyofantares 2y ago
    A few days ago I was playing a trivia-ish game in which I was asked to spell "unlabeled", which I did. The questioner said I was wrong, that it "has two l's" (the U.K. spelling being "unlabelled"). I jokingly countered that I had spelled it with two l's, which she took to mean that I was claiming to have spelled it "unlabelled".
- lxgr 2y ago
  Gell-Mann amnesia is powerful. Hope you extrapolate from that experience! At a technical level, they don't know because LLMs "think" (I'd really call it something more like "quickly associate" for any pre-o1 model and maybe beyond) in tokens, not letters, so unless their training data contains a representation of each token split into its constituent letters, they are literally incapable of "looking at a word". (I wouldn't be surprised if they'd fare better looking at a screenshot of the word!)
- robwwilliams 2y ago
  Today: Claude Let me count carefully: s-t-[r]-a-w-b-e-[r]-[r]-y There are 3 Rs in "strawberry".
  - e1g 2y ago
    This app uses Claude over the API, and that "In the word "strawberry" there are 2 r's.". Claude web chat is correct, though.
kanodiaashu 2y ago
This reminds me of the search engine aggregators in the old days that used to somehow install themselves on internet explorer and then collected search results from multiple providers and sometimes compared them. I wonder if this time these tools will persist.
solomatov 2y ago
I would be much more likely to install this if it was published in the app store.
- ripped_britches 2y ago
  Most popular Mac apps like Spotify, vscode, are not
  - n2d4 2y ago
    Because they're big enough so they can afford not to, and they want to do things that the sandbox/review process/monetisation rules wouldn't let them. I assume the sandbox is exactly why parent wants the app to be there
    - yuppiepuppie 2y ago
      I would have thought the exact opposite to your statement, they are big enough that they should afford it. Seems like the ability to forgo the app store on mac allows apple to get away with stuff like high friction review process and monetization rules. Without the big players pushing back, why would they change?
      - KetoManx64 2y ago
        Doesn't apple charge app store apps 30% all their transactions/subscriptions? What company in their right mind would want to opt into that if they don't have to?
        solomatov 2y ago
        A smaller to a medium sized company. Due to several reasons: - Setting up payment with a third party provider isn't that simple, and their fees are far from zero. - Getting users. Popular queries in Google are full of existing results, and getting into there isn't easy and isn't cheap. Also, search engines aren't the most popular way to get apps to your devices, usually people search directly in app stores. Apple takes care of it, i.e. I guess that popular app with good ratings get to higher position in search results. - Trust. I install apps on the computer without Apple only if I trust the supplier of the software (or have to have it there). Apple solves it with their sandboxing. Yep, 30% are a lot, but for these kinds of businesses it might be well worth it (especially with reduced commission of 15% for smaller revenue).
sagarpatil 2y ago
msty.app does this and much more. It’s open source too.
- pizza 2y ago
  I looked at the site and it doesn't appear to be open source. https://msty.app/pricing https://msty.app/pricing
  - dcreater 2y ago
    It's definitely not open source
- theoreticalmal 2y ago
  Free for personal use with lots of local data, but not open source
cryptozeus 2y ago
Thanks for simple landing page and most simple example anyone can understand.
dcreater 2y ago
Airtrain.ai and msty.app have had this for a while. What isn't there and would be useful is to not have them side by side but rather swipable. When you're using for code comparisons even 2 gets stuffy
- kmlx 2y ago
  imo even more useful would be to have a single answer that represents a mix of all the other answers (with an option to see each individual answer etc)
  - sdesol 2y ago
    I have that in the chat app that I am working on. https://beta.gitsense.com/?chat=51219672-9a37-442d-80a3-14d8defeda71 https://beta.gitsense.com/?chat=51219672-9a37-442d-80a3-14d8... It provides a summary of all the responses and if you click on "Conversation" in the user message bubble, you can view all the LLM responses to the question of "How many r's in strawberry". You can fork the message as well and say create a single response based on all responses. Edit: The chatting capability has been disabled as I don't want to incur an unwanted bill.
whatever1 2y ago
Isn’t this cheating? What will the AI overlords think about this behavior once they take over things ?
rubymamis 2y ago
If you're looking for a fast, native alternative for Windows, Linux (and macOS), you can join my new app waitlist: https://www.get-vox.com https://www.get-vox.com
- KetoManx64 2y ago
  Is it going to be open source?
  - rubymamis 2y ago
    I'm not sure. I thought about setting up a funding goal, after which I'll open source it.
ranguna 2y ago
lmarena.ai is also pretty good. It's not mac exclusive, works from the browser and has a bunch of different AIs to choose from. It doesn't keep a history when you close the tab though
mikae1 2y ago
Was hoping this would be a LM Studio alternative (for local LLMs) with a friendlier UI. I think there's a genuine need for that. It could make available only the LLLMs that your Mac is able to run. Many Silicon owners are sitting on very able hardware without even knowing.
- wkat4242 2y ago
  I don't know LM Studio but I really like OpenWebUI. Maybe worth a try. I use it mainly because my LLM runs on a server, not my usual desktop.
  - lgas 2y ago
    On that note, I recently learned from Simon Willson's blog that if you have uv installed, , you can try OpenWebUI via: uvx --python 3.11 open-webui serve
- sunnybeetroot 2y ago
  Try msty.app
- rubymamis 2y ago
  This is exactly what I’m building at https://www.get-vox.com https://www.get-vox.com - it automatically detects your local models installed via Ollama. It is fast, native and cross-platform (built with Qt using C++ and QML).
- Charlieholtz 2y ago
  Just added support for Ollama and LM Studio servers! I'm getting 66 tokens/sec and 0.17s time to first token for Llama 3.1, it's pretty mind-blowing. https://x.com/charliebholtz/status/1873798821526069258 https://x.com/charliebholtz/status/1873798821526069258
- deleted 2y ago
  [deleted]
prmoustache 2y ago
Or you can do that on your tmux terminal multiplexer using the synchronize-pane options. A number of terminals can also do that natively (kitty comes to mind).
- Lionga 2y ago
  Dropbox ist just curlftpfs with SVN, in other words useless.
  - prmoustache 2y ago
    I see what you did there. But the actual amount of effort to get to the level of dropbox in a multiple device context is a number of magnitude higher than the triviality of autoloading a handful of cli tool in different panes and synchronizing them in tmux.
    - prmoustache 2y ago
      example here: https://forge.chapril.org/prmoustache/examples/src/branch/main/bash_functions/tmux-ai-prompts.sh https://forge.chapril.org/prmoustache/examples/src/branch/ma... Only 35 lines of code including empty lines and comments. That approach is also dead simple to maintain, multiplatform and more flexible: - separation of form and function: tmux handle the layout and sync, the individual tools handle the AI models. - I can use remote machines with SSH
Charlieholtz 2y ago
Hi! One of the creators of Chorus here. Really cool to hear how everyone is using it. We made this as an experiment because it felt silly to constantly be switching between the ChatGPT, Claude, and LMStudio desktop app. It's also nice to be able to run models with custom system prompts in one place (I have Claude with a summary of how CBT works that I find pretty helpful). It's a Tauri 2.0 desktop app (not Electron!), so it is using the Mac's native browser view and a Rust backend. It also makes DMG size relatively small (~25mb but we can get it much smaller once we get rid of some bloat). Right now Chorus is proxying API calls to our server, so it's free to use. We didn't add bring-your-own-api key to this version because it was a bit quicker to ship. This was kind of an experimental winter break project, so didn't think too hard about it. Likely will have to fix that (and add bring your own key? or a paid version?) as more of you use it :) Definitely planning on adding support for local models too. Happy to answer any other questions, and any feedback is super helpful (and motivating!) for us. UPDATE: Just added the option to bring your own API keys! It should be rolling out over the next hour or so.
- d4rkp4ttern 2y ago
  Curious to check it out but a quick question — does it have autocomplete (GitHub copilot-style) in the chat window. IMO one of the biggest missing feature in most chat apps is autocomplete. Typing messages in these chat apps quickly becomes tedious and autocompletions help a lot with this. I’m regularly shocked that it’s almost year 3 of LLMs (depending on how you count) and none of the big vendors have thought of adding this feature. Another mind-numbingly obvious feature — hitting enter should just create a new-line. And cmd-enter should submit. Or at least have it configurable for this. (EDITED for clarity)
  - Charlieholtz 2y ago
    Enter does continue the chat! And shift-enter for new line. My Mac now has built in copilot style completions (maybe only since upgrading to Sequoia?). They're not amazing but they're decent. https://support.apple.com/guide/mac-help/typing-suggestions-correct-mistakes-mac-mchlp2299/mac https://support.apple.com/guide/mac-help/typing-suggestions-...
cmiller1 2y ago
Is the name a Star Trek TNG reference? https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Riva%27s_chorus https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Riva%27s_chorus
HelloUsername 2y ago
What's the difference with https://duckduckgo.com/?q=DuckDuckGo+AI+Chat&ia=chat&duckai=1 https://duckduckgo.com/?q=DuckDuckGo+AI+Chat&ia=chat&duckai=... ?
- rrr_oh_man 2y ago
  There should not be more than one pizza restaurant
wonderfuly 2y ago
ChatHub is the first service to do this, and it's been around for almost two years, even before the release of the GPT-3.5 API.
detente18 2y ago
Your changelog is neat - is this custom built or via some embeddable tool?
sharonbiren 2y ago
Is it supposed to support Intel-based chips in the future? It cannot run on my Mac

139 points by Charlieholtz 2y ago

nomilk 2y ago

Love the idea. I frequently use ChatGPT (out of habit) and while it's generating, copy/paste the same prompt into claude and grok. This seems like a good way to save time.

sleno 2y ago

very well designed! how does this work? in the sense that i didn't have to copy/paste any keys and yet this is offering paid models for free.

swyx 2y ago
if you are not paying... you are the product
- KingMob 2y ago
  As Cory Doctorow has documented, you're frequently still the product even when paying: https://pluralistic.net/2024/03/12/market-failure/#car-wars https://pluralistic.net/2024/03/12/market-failure/#car-wars
- Charlieholtz 2y ago
  ahah true, but in this case, we're (melty) just paying right now. I wanted to make it really easy to try and didn't implement bring your own keys yet. I probably should ask O1 to fix that
Charlieholtz 2y ago
Thanks! Right now Chorus is proxying API calls to our server so it's free. This was kind of an experimental winter break project that we were using internally, and it was quicker to ship this way. Likely going to add bring your own API keys (or a paid version) soon. Update: just added option to bring your own keys! Should be available within an hour.

maroonblazer 2y ago

Just tried this with an interpersonal situation I'm going through. The default seems to be Claude 3.5 Sonnet and ChatGPT-4o. I got the results I've come to expect from those two, with the latter better at non-programming kinds of prompts. The app presented the option of prompting additional models, including Gemini Flash 2.0, one I'd never used before. It gave the best response and was surprisingly good. Curious to know how Chorus is paying for the compute, as I was expecting to have to use my own API keys.

owenpalmer 2y ago
Do they have really strict rate limits? How much did you use it?
benatkin 2y ago
Some throttling plus having a limited number of users by it being a desktop app perhaps. I just checked to see if it was signed, without running it. It is. I don't care to take the risk of running it even if it's signed. If it were a web app I'd check it out. I don't know if there's any sort of login. With a login, they could throttle based on that. Without a login, it looks like they could use this to check if it's being used by an Apple computer. https://developer.apple.com/documentation/devicecheck/validating-apps-that-connect-to-your-server https://developer.apple.com/documentation/devicecheck/valida...
- sunnybeetroot 2y ago
  DeviceCheck is not available for macOS apps, see the following documentation: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/devicecheck/dcappattestservice/issupported https://developer.apple.com/documentation/devicecheck/dcappa...
  - benatkin 2y ago
    I see. I had checked attestKey and it says "Mac Catalyst 14.0+ | macOS 11.0+" among others, but that just means the API is present. developer.apple.com/documentation/devicecheck/dcappattestservice/attestkey(_:clientdatahash:completionhandler:)

486sx33 2y ago

Sweet !

paul7986 2y ago

Cool and GPT/Claude think there are only 2 "r"s in strawberry? Wow that's a bit scary (use GPT a lot) how bad a fail that is!

joshstrange 2y ago
I maintain that “2 ‘r’s” is a semi-valid answer. If a human is writing, pauses and looks up to ask that question they almost certainly want to hear “2”.
- furyofantares 2y ago
  A few days ago I was playing a trivia-ish game in which I was asked to spell "unlabeled", which I did. The questioner said I was wrong, that it "has two l's" (the U.K. spelling being "unlabelled"). I jokingly countered that I had spelled it with two l's, which she took to mean that I was claiming to have spelled it "unlabelled".
lxgr 2y ago
Gell-Mann amnesia is powerful. Hope you extrapolate from that experience! At a technical level, they don't know because LLMs "think" (I'd really call it something more like "quickly associate" for any pre-o1 model and maybe beyond) in tokens, not letters, so unless their training data contains a representation of each token split into its constituent letters, they are literally incapable of "looking at a word". (I wouldn't be surprised if they'd fare better looking at a screenshot of the word!)
robwwilliams 2y ago
Today: Claude Let me count carefully: s-t-[r]-a-w-b-e-[r]-[r]-y There are 3 Rs in "strawberry".
- e1g 2y ago
  This app uses Claude over the API, and that "In the word "strawberry" there are 2 r's.". Claude web chat is correct, though.

kanodiaashu 2y ago

This reminds me of the search engine aggregators in the old days that used to somehow install themselves on internet explorer and then collected search results from multiple providers and sometimes compared them. I wonder if this time these tools will persist.

solomatov 2y ago

I would be much more likely to install this if it was published in the app store.

ripped_britches 2y ago
Most popular Mac apps like Spotify, vscode, are not
- n2d4 2y ago
  Because they're big enough so they can afford not to, and they want to do things that the sandbox/review process/monetisation rules wouldn't let them. I assume the sandbox is exactly why parent wants the app to be there
  - yuppiepuppie 2y ago
    I would have thought the exact opposite to your statement, they are big enough that they should afford it. Seems like the ability to forgo the app store on mac allows apple to get away with stuff like high friction review process and monetization rules. Without the big players pushing back, why would they change?
    - KetoManx64 2y ago
      Doesn't apple charge app store apps 30% all their transactions/subscriptions? What company in their right mind would want to opt into that if they don't have to?
      - solomatov 2y ago
        A smaller to a medium sized company. Due to several reasons: - Setting up payment with a third party provider isn't that simple, and their fees are far from zero. - Getting users. Popular queries in Google are full of existing results, and getting into there isn't easy and isn't cheap. Also, search engines aren't the most popular way to get apps to your devices, usually people search directly in app stores. Apple takes care of it, i.e. I guess that popular app with good ratings get to higher position in search results. - Trust. I install apps on the computer without Apple only if I trust the supplier of the software (or have to have it there). Apple solves it with their sandboxing. Yep, 30% are a lot, but for these kinds of businesses it might be well worth it (especially with reduced commission of 15% for smaller revenue).

sagarpatil 2y ago

msty.app does this and much more. It’s open source too.

pizza 2y ago
I looked at the site and it doesn't appear to be open source. https://msty.app/pricing https://msty.app/pricing
- dcreater 2y ago
  It's definitely not open source
theoreticalmal 2y ago
Free for personal use with lots of local data, but not open source

cryptozeus 2y ago

Thanks for simple landing page and most simple example anyone can understand.

dcreater 2y ago

Airtrain.ai and msty.app have had this for a while. What isn't there and would be useful is to not have them side by side but rather swipable. When you're using for code comparisons even 2 gets stuffy

kmlx 2y ago
imo even more useful would be to have a single answer that represents a mix of all the other answers (with an option to see each individual answer etc)
- sdesol 2y ago
  I have that in the chat app that I am working on. https://beta.gitsense.com/?chat=51219672-9a37-442d-80a3-14d8defeda71 https://beta.gitsense.com/?chat=51219672-9a37-442d-80a3-14d8... It provides a summary of all the responses and if you click on "Conversation" in the user message bubble, you can view all the LLM responses to the question of "How many r's in strawberry". You can fork the message as well and say create a single response based on all responses. Edit: The chatting capability has been disabled as I don't want to incur an unwanted bill.

whatever1 2y ago

Isn’t this cheating? What will the AI overlords think about this behavior once they take over things ?

rubymamis 2y ago

If you're looking for a fast, native alternative for Windows, Linux (and macOS), you can join my new app waitlist: https://www.get-vox.com https://www.get-vox.com

KetoManx64 2y ago
Is it going to be open source?
- rubymamis 2y ago
  I'm not sure. I thought about setting up a funding goal, after which I'll open source it.

ranguna 2y ago

lmarena.ai is also pretty good. It's not mac exclusive, works from the browser and has a bunch of different AIs to choose from. It doesn't keep a history when you close the tab though

mikae1 2y ago

Was hoping this would be a LM Studio alternative (for local LLMs) with a friendlier UI. I think there's a genuine need for that. It could make available only the LLLMs that your Mac is able to run. Many Silicon owners are sitting on very able hardware without even knowing.

wkat4242 2y ago
I don't know LM Studio but I really like OpenWebUI. Maybe worth a try. I use it mainly because my LLM runs on a server, not my usual desktop.
- lgas 2y ago
  On that note, I recently learned from Simon Willson's blog that if you have uv installed, , you can try OpenWebUI via: uvx --python 3.11 open-webui serve
sunnybeetroot 2y ago
Try msty.app
rubymamis 2y ago
This is exactly what I’m building at https://www.get-vox.com https://www.get-vox.com - it automatically detects your local models installed via Ollama. It is fast, native and cross-platform (built with Qt using C++ and QML).
Charlieholtz 2y ago
Just added support for Ollama and LM Studio servers! I'm getting 66 tokens/sec and 0.17s time to first token for Llama 3.1, it's pretty mind-blowing. https://x.com/charliebholtz/status/1873798821526069258 https://x.com/charliebholtz/status/1873798821526069258
deleted 2y ago
[deleted]

prmoustache 2y ago

Or you can do that on your tmux terminal multiplexer using the synchronize-pane options. A number of terminals can also do that natively (kitty comes to mind).

Lionga 2y ago
Dropbox ist just curlftpfs with SVN, in other words useless.
- prmoustache 2y ago
  I see what you did there. But the actual amount of effort to get to the level of dropbox in a multiple device context is a number of magnitude higher than the triviality of autoloading a handful of cli tool in different panes and synchronizing them in tmux.
  - prmoustache 2y ago
    example here: https://forge.chapril.org/prmoustache/examples/src/branch/main/bash_functions/tmux-ai-prompts.sh https://forge.chapril.org/prmoustache/examples/src/branch/ma... Only 35 lines of code including empty lines and comments. That approach is also dead simple to maintain, multiplatform and more flexible: - separation of form and function: tmux handle the layout and sync, the individual tools handle the AI models. - I can use remote machines with SSH

Charlieholtz 2y ago

Hi! One of the creators of Chorus here. Really cool to hear how everyone is using it. We made this as an experiment because it felt silly to constantly be switching between the ChatGPT, Claude, and LMStudio desktop app. It's also nice to be able to run models with custom system prompts in one place (I have Claude with a summary of how CBT works that I find pretty helpful). It's a Tauri 2.0 desktop app (not Electron!), so it is using the Mac's native browser view and a Rust backend. It also makes DMG size relatively small (~25mb but we can get it much smaller once we get rid of some bloat). Right now Chorus is proxying API calls to our server, so it's free to use. We didn't add bring-your-own-api key to this version because it was a bit quicker to ship. This was kind of an experimental winter break project, so didn't think too hard about it. Likely will have to fix that (and add bring your own key? or a paid version?) as more of you use it :) Definitely planning on adding support for local models too. Happy to answer any other questions, and any feedback is super helpful (and motivating!) for us. UPDATE: Just added the option to bring your own API keys! It should be rolling out over the next hour or so.

d4rkp4ttern 2y ago
Curious to check it out but a quick question — does it have autocomplete (GitHub copilot-style) in the chat window. IMO one of the biggest missing feature in most chat apps is autocomplete. Typing messages in these chat apps quickly becomes tedious and autocompletions help a lot with this. I’m regularly shocked that it’s almost year 3 of LLMs (depending on how you count) and none of the big vendors have thought of adding this feature. Another mind-numbingly obvious feature — hitting enter should just create a new-line. And cmd-enter should submit. Or at least have it configurable for this. (EDITED for clarity)
- Charlieholtz 2y ago
  Enter does continue the chat! And shift-enter for new line. My Mac now has built in copilot style completions (maybe only since upgrading to Sequoia?). They're not amazing but they're decent. https://support.apple.com/guide/mac-help/typing-suggestions-correct-mistakes-mac-mchlp2299/mac https://support.apple.com/guide/mac-help/typing-suggestions-...

cmiller1 2y ago

Is the name a Star Trek TNG reference? https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Riva%27s_chorus https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Riva%27s_chorus

HelloUsername 2y ago

What's the difference with https://duckduckgo.com/?q=DuckDuckGo+AI+Chat&ia=chat&duckai=1 https://duckduckgo.com/?q=DuckDuckGo+AI+Chat&ia=chat&duckai=... ?

rrr_oh_man 2y ago
There should not be more than one pizza restaurant

wonderfuly 2y ago

ChatHub is the first service to do this, and it's been around for almost two years, even before the release of the GPT-3.5 API.

detente18 2y ago

Your changelog is neat - is this custom built or via some embeddable tool?

sharonbiren 2y ago

Is it supposed to support Intel-based chips in the future? It cannot run on my Mac