3 ms·
Your counter opinion kinda confirms the issues with stuff like DDD being consistently open to interpretation. Not surprising, it lacks clear and rigorous defin
by epolanski 2y ago
Your counter opinion kinda confirms the issues with stuff like DDD being consistently open to interpretation.
Not surprising, it lacks clear and rigorous definitions and almost everything is example-driven.
It's like lacking both the rigour of academia, and the practicality of seasoned engineers at the same time.
- pyrale 2y agoThe same is true of every interesting concept in dev, unfortunately: design patterns being made into a pokedex, agile into an inflexible process, hexagonal arch into a guideline for project directories’ names and layout, metrics into goals, etc.