3 ms·
Doesn't the idea of an "LSP for Neovim" mean the entire premise of LSP has failed? Wasn't the whole idea supposedly to put an end to editor-specific plugins in
by lolinder 2y ago
Doesn't the idea of an "LSP for Neovim" mean the entire premise of LSP has failed? Wasn't the whole idea supposedly to put an end to editor-specific plugins in favor of one protocol spoken by all editors?
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- femiagbabiaka 2y agoLSP exposes standard interfaces, but it still has to be bridged across the variety of languages editor plugins are written in. It’s much better than the previous state.
- lolinder 2y ago> LSP exposes standard interfaces, but it still has to be bridged Why is the bridge not "specify where to find the LSP server"?
- dzaima 2y agoIt is just that. (of course in practice you also need to get the LSP to exist on your system somewhere in the first place and have a command that runs it (rather annoying for java programs), but other than that it's literally just a program with JSON I/O)