> I don't think you're trying to understand what I'm saying I'm trying, but obviously I'm failing. > I don't think I need to specify that by uninformed decisi

> I don't think you're trying to understand what I'm saying I'm trying, but obviously I'm failing. > I don't think I need to specify that by uninformed decision I mean evaluating the security risk of the feature. For the third time, that wasn't what I was trying to do with the blog post. > you're (understandably) not engaging with me fairly in retaliation I don't think you're understanding me either. I'm not retaliating. I was trying to clarify.