81 ms·
I wonder if anyone has tried training an LLM on known spam and measured it's performance? Such an LLM would ideally be run local to the mail server for maximum
by simpaticoder 2y ago
I wonder if anyone has tried training an LLM on known spam and measured it's performance? Such an LLM would ideally be run local to the mail server for maximum privacy.
- SoftTalker 2y agoI don’t know why that would be necessary. The vast majority of the spam I get is obviously spam from the subject line alone.
- ninjin 2y agoIgnoring e-mail content and throwing Naive-Bayes on the header alone is pretty much hove we got amazing spam filters about 15 years ago. All of course using a millionth or less of the resources a large language model would use.
- b112 2y agoSir! The willies you just gave me have no compare. What if said AI gains sentience, but trained on that data?!
- creshal 2y agorspamd has had an option for it for a while, but the older markov chain based filters tend to work well enough.