4 ms·

My thoughts exactly, though my sentiment is that Steve Mann deserves some thought from Glass engineers. I've been following his work for some years (decades) n

My thoughts exactly, though my sentiment is that Steve Mann deserves some thought from Glass engineers. I've been following his work for some years (decades) now, and while he is an "interesting" person, he has made many leaps in both design and tech involved, as well as testing.

ChuckMcM 14y ago
Absolutely, the guy is a frickin' genius! All I know is we have three things: 1) A patent for the 'eyetrap' issued in 2003 with another 8 years or so to run. 2) A huge company with > $100B in the bank who has made a big publicity play betting on their technology that, on the surface clearly infringes. 3) No statements either from either party that a license is in place. In fact the Google Glass page should say "this device is covered by patents ..." but it doesn't. If in fact no license exists, I see a table in the square with between 100M$ and a 1B$ sitting on it with nobody watching. I would not be surprised in the least that someone decided to try and take it off the table. Time will tell.
- hollerith 14y ago
  >A huge company with > $100B in the bank Google doesn't have > $100B in the bank (citation: http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bs?s=goog+Balance+Sheet http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bs?s=goog+Balance+Sheet). You are probably thinking of Apple.
  - ChuckMcM 14y ago
    Your right they have been spending big chunks of late (I believe the Motorola deal recently closed so that 12B check had to clear the bank eventually). I continue to believe that Google is perceived to be a 'high value' target by offensive litigators.
- Schwolop 14y ago
  The technology used in eyetrap and Google's glasses is sufficiently different that I doubt the eyetrap patent is really being infringed by Google. I doubt Steve has the money or desire to take Google to court anyway, and probably holds the patent as a defensive measure against himself being sued by someone like Google.
  - ChuckMcM 14y ago
    Sort of FYI, plaintiff lawyers in the US may choose to work on a contingency basis if they think there is a big payoff at the end, no cost to the plaintiff, just let them sue on your behalf and they are off to the races.

ChuckMcM 14y ago

Absolutely, the guy is a frickin' genius! All I know is we have three things: 1) A patent for the 'eyetrap' issued in 2003 with another 8 years or so to run. 2) A huge company with > $100B in the bank who has made a big publicity play betting on their technology that, on the surface clearly infringes. 3) No statements either from either party that a license is in place. In fact the Google Glass page should say "this device is covered by patents ..." but it doesn't. If in fact no license exists, I see a table in the square with between 100M$ and a 1B$ sitting on it with nobody watching. I would not be surprised in the least that someone decided to try and take it off the table. Time will tell.

hollerith 14y ago
>A huge company with > $100B in the bank Google doesn't have > $100B in the bank (citation: http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bs?s=goog+Balance+Sheet http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bs?s=goog+Balance+Sheet). You are probably thinking of Apple.
- ChuckMcM 14y ago
  Your right they have been spending big chunks of late (I believe the Motorola deal recently closed so that 12B check had to clear the bank eventually). I continue to believe that Google is perceived to be a 'high value' target by offensive litigators.
Schwolop 14y ago
The technology used in eyetrap and Google's glasses is sufficiently different that I doubt the eyetrap patent is really being infringed by Google. I doubt Steve has the money or desire to take Google to court anyway, and probably holds the patent as a defensive measure against himself being sued by someone like Google.
- ChuckMcM 14y ago
  Sort of FYI, plaintiff lawyers in the US may choose to work on a contingency basis if they think there is a big payoff at the end, no cost to the plaintiff, just let them sue on your behalf and they are off to the races.