4 ms·

The government has no right to destroy property (by any method) of private citizens who are flying drones when there is no evidence of illegality or of them bei

The government has no right to destroy property (by any method) of private citizens who are flying drones when there is no evidence of illegality or of them being a credible threat. To say "flying a drone makes it a credible threat" to say "drones are illegal," which someone is free to take up as their legislative priority.

giantg2 2y ago
If you're flying your drone in a restricted area, then it would be illegal. Many of the drone-downing systems do not permanently destroy it. On a side note, do you have a TRUST or Part 107?
- llamaimperative 2y ago
  Yeah, duh if it's in a restricted area. That's not what the drone hysteria is about. > Many of the drone-downing systems do not permanently destroy it. Uhh yeah if a consumer grade drone falls 300 feet out of the sky then yes it's destroyed.
  - giantg2 2y ago
    "Yeah, duh if it's in a restricted area. That's not what the drone hysteria is about." Look up TFRs. Look up all the other restrictions these drones are supposed to be following. Tell me how they're legal. "Uhh yeah if a consumer grade drone falls 300 feet out of the sky then yes it's destroyed." Not irreparably. Some components will.
    - llamaimperative 2y ago
      First TFRs in NJ went up on Dec 18... and suuspiiciousslyyy.... drone sightings disappear! https://nypost.com/2024/12/28/us-news/mystery-nj-drone-sightings-drop-after-early-december-surge/ https://nypost.com/2024/12/28/us-news/mystery-nj-drone-sight... > Not irreparably. Some components will. Okay. Lol what are you even arguing right now? It is not legal for the USG to destroy, seize, or damage people's property when they are not breaking the law or credibly threatening people. At the times of the drone sightings, there was no evidence whatsoever of them breaking the law or credibly threatening people. Please state your position explicitly instead of this silly dance.

giantg2 2y ago

If you're flying your drone in a restricted area, then it would be illegal. Many of the drone-downing systems do not permanently destroy it. On a side note, do you have a TRUST or Part 107?

llamaimperative 2y ago
Yeah, duh if it's in a restricted area. That's not what the drone hysteria is about. > Many of the drone-downing systems do not permanently destroy it. Uhh yeah if a consumer grade drone falls 300 feet out of the sky then yes it's destroyed.
- giantg2 2y ago
  "Yeah, duh if it's in a restricted area. That's not what the drone hysteria is about." Look up TFRs. Look up all the other restrictions these drones are supposed to be following. Tell me how they're legal. "Uhh yeah if a consumer grade drone falls 300 feet out of the sky then yes it's destroyed." Not irreparably. Some components will.
  - llamaimperative 2y ago
    First TFRs in NJ went up on Dec 18... and suuspiiciousslyyy.... drone sightings disappear! https://nypost.com/2024/12/28/us-news/mystery-nj-drone-sightings-drop-after-early-december-surge/ https://nypost.com/2024/12/28/us-news/mystery-nj-drone-sight... > Not irreparably. Some components will. Okay. Lol what are you even arguing right now? It is not legal for the USG to destroy, seize, or damage people's property when they are not breaking the law or credibly threatening people. At the times of the drone sightings, there was no evidence whatsoever of them breaking the law or credibly threatening people. Please state your position explicitly instead of this silly dance.