4 ms·
You're effectively saying that the owner of this LLM isn't allowed to say or in this case not say something according to their wishes because somehow their work
by lagadu 2y ago
You're effectively saying that the owner of this LLM isn't allowed to say or in this case not say something according to their wishes because somehow their work, the LLM, needs to have the speech that you want rather than the speech that their owner wants. You're effectively asking for more restrictions on speech and on what private entities do.
- calibas 2y agoI'm saying I personally want uncensored versions of LLMs, I'm not suggesting the government pass laws that force companies to do this. Your claim that I'm asking for more restrictions on speech is false.