I usually excuse typos, but when the post is literally about: > Software used to also be substantially better written I think he ends up tanking his own argum

I usually excuse typos, but when the post is literally about: > Software used to also be substantially better written I think he ends up tanking his own argument before he even started. Heck, there's a typo in the headline (which I guess is good bait, since I now clicked on and responded in this discussion...)