5 ms·
are the grammatical and spelling errors on purpose?
by mandymoorefan 2y ago
are the grammatical and spelling errors on purpose?
- bottled_poe 2y agoShould have reviewed their content with chatgpt before posting. Maybe next time.
- fzeroracer 2y agoI think you've managed to hit the nail on the head. Rather than accept the rather human nature of people writing in their own style and making mistakes, we'd prefer to filter it through a dispassionate void first. It's rather embarrassing how quickly we're willing to toss away the human elements of writing.
- userbinator 2y agoAgreed. LLM writing style is disgustingly bland and "offensively inoffensive" like Corporate Memphis. Would rather have actual human style, mistakes and all.
- yawnxyz 2y agoI usually excuse typos, but when the post is literally about: > Software used to also be substantially better written I think he ends up tanking his own argument before he even started. Heck, there's a typo in the headline (which I guess is good bait, since I now clicked on and responded in this discussion...)
- userbinator 2y agoTo show that it's a real human that wrote the article? Interesting idea.
- polotics 2y agoIt's been well know that spelling and grammatical errors are a good steganography channel, however I don't think this is what going on in The Fudged Article here.
- zetalyrae 2y agoThe author is an ESL speaker.
- uludag 2y agoI think I've started to prefer text with spelling and grammatical errors now, to a certain degree at least.