4 ms·
>these numbers are arbitrary Seeing as Intel 7 is formerly Intel 10nm, there is at least a reasonable argument in that Intel's number is one size(?) smaller th
by Dalewyn 2y ago
>these numbers are arbitrary
Seeing as Intel 7 is formerly Intel 10nm, there is at least a reasonable argument in that Intel's number is one size(?) smaller than it should be.
- silisili 2y agoIt's equally likely Intel realized it performed as well as Samsung/TSMC "7". Which is the whole issue, we'll never really know.