3 ms·

I'm not refuting the statement, only pointing out that density is not the only factor. Unfortunately, these numbers are arbitrary and companies are guessing wh

I'm not refuting the statement, only pointing out that density is not the only factor. Unfortunately, these numbers are arbitrary and companies are guessing what performs about like what based on numerous factors. Often wrongly - Samsung's equivalents were so bad Qualcomm pretty much abandoned them, and for good reason. Anyone who used an Exynos or SD888 understands why. I feel like we should have landed on a better tracking system now, like perf/watt, but here we are.

Dalewyn 2y ago
>these numbers are arbitrary Seeing as Intel 7 is formerly Intel 10nm, there is at least a reasonable argument in that Intel's number is one size(?) smaller than it should be.
- silisili 2y ago
  It's equally likely Intel realized it performed as well as Samsung/TSMC "7". Which is the whole issue, we'll never really know.