4 ms·
> In fall of 2023, for example, without consulting or informing the editors, Elsevier initiated the use of AI during production, creating article proofs devoid
by duxup 2y ago
> In fall of 2023, for example, without consulting or informing the editors, Elsevier initiated the use of AI during production, creating article proofs devoid of capitalization of all proper nouns (e.g., formally recognized epochs, site names, countries, cities, genera, etc.) as well italics for genera and species. These AI changes reversed the accepted versions of papers that had already been properly formatted by the handling editors. This was highly embarrassing for the journal and resolution took six months and was achieved only through the persistent efforts of the editors. AI processing continues to be used and regularly reformats submitted manuscripts to change meaning and formatting and require extensive author and editor oversight during proof stage
I was the removal of proper nouns some sort of AI safety mechanism?
- Thorrez 2y agoI don't think the AI removed proper nouns, but rather uncapitalized the proper nouns. It sounds to me like the AI was trying to improve formatting, but instead made formatting worse.
- ciconia 2y agoThe proper question to ask is why is AI employed to edit articles when there's already a team of professional editors in place?